[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] nr_irqs_gsi
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:30:37PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 12.07.12 at 04:17, Joe Jin <joe.jin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x00] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0]) > >>>> (XEN) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 0, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23 > >>>> (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec80000] gsi_base[32]) > >>>> (XEN) IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 1, version 32, address 0xfec80000, GSI 32-55 > > > > Below came from dom0: > > > > ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0xff] high edge lint[0x1]) > > ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x00] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0]) > > IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 0, version 255, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-255 > > Now this and ... > > > ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec80000] gsi_base[32]) > > IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 1, version 255, address 0xfec80000, GSI 32-287 > > ... this is clearly bogus, contradicting what Xen itself prints (see > above). Yeah, that got fixed up in v3.5 (merge git f08b9c2f8af0d61faa1170aeae4fbca1eff6a504) specifically: x86/apic: Fix UP boot crash xen/apic: implement io apic read with hypercall xen/x86: Implement x86_apic_ops x86/apic: Replace io_apic_ops with x86_io_apic_ops. x86/ioapic: Add io_apic_ops driver layer to allow interception and the kernel Joe is using (UEK2) should have those back-ported.. Ah, he is using the older version I think. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |