[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] nr_irqs_gsi



On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:30:37PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 12.07.12 at 04:17, Joe Jin <joe.jin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>> (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x00] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
> >>>> (XEN) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 0, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
> >>>> (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec80000] gsi_base[32])
> >>>> (XEN) IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 1, version 32, address 0xfec80000, GSI 32-55
> >
> > Below came from dom0:
> > 
> > ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0xff] high edge lint[0x1])
> > ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x00] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
> > IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 0, version 255, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-255
> 
> Now this and ...
> 
> > ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec80000] gsi_base[32])
> > IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 1, version 255, address 0xfec80000, GSI 32-287
> 
> ... this is clearly bogus, contradicting what Xen itself prints (see
> above).

Yeah, that got fixed up in v3.5 (merge git 
f08b9c2f8af0d61faa1170aeae4fbca1eff6a504)
specifically:

      x86/apic: Fix UP boot crash
      xen/apic: implement io apic read with hypercall
      xen/x86: Implement x86_apic_ops
      x86/apic: Replace io_apic_ops with x86_io_apic_ops.
      x86/ioapic: Add io_apic_ops driver layer to allow interception

and the kernel Joe is using (UEK2) should have those back-ported.. Ah, he is
using the older version I think.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.