Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xl: rename "list-vm" command to "vm-list"

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xl: rename "list-vm" command to 
"vm-list""):
> On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 16:08 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Doesn't it also exclude dm stubdoms, service domains (stub xenstored),
> > etc. ?  IMO it should, and the docs should say so.
> 
> Usually we would say "guest" rather than "domain" to convey this (a
> guest might consist of multiple domains).

Yes, that's the right terminology.

> > If it doesn't then that's IMO a bug but stubdoms are a bit buggy
> > anyway so I don't regard fixing that as a blocker for this patch.  But
> > I think we should introduce docs that are correct.
> > 
> > If you and Ian agree, perhaps you'd like to clarify that (and perhaps
> > change the usage message too).
> 
> I'm happy for the docs to change to reflect what we want but I don't
> want to delay this patch actually making the implementation match.

Exactly.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel