[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/5] xen/vgic: initialize pending_irqs.lr_queue
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 18:53 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 12:22 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > Properly initialize all the pending_irqs.lr_queue like we do for > > > inflight. > > > Check whether we already have the irq in lr_queue before adding it. > > > > Should this be a fatal error? Can a guest make this happen? > > it could happen if the guest keeps enabling and disabling the irqs using > the GICD_ICENABLERn and the GICD_ISENABLERn registers. Then the printk is probably wrong. At the least it should be a gdprintk but really I think it is unnecessary. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 6 ++++++ > > > xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 6 ++++++ > > > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > > > index 2e41d75..998033a 100644 > > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > > > @@ -456,6 +456,12 @@ void gic_set_guest_irq(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int > > > virtual_irq, > > > } > > > > > > n = irq_to_pending(v, virtual_irq); > > > + if ( !list_empty(&n->lr_queue) ) > > > + { > > > + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: irq %d already in lr_queue\n", __func__, > > > + virtual_irq); > > > + goto out; > > > + } > > > list_for_each_entry ( iter, &v->arch.vgic.lr_pending, lr_queue ) > > > { > > > if ( iter->priority > priority ) > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > > > index 4cdfec5..653e8e5 100644 > > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > > > @@ -84,7 +84,10 @@ int domain_vgic_init(struct domain *d) > > > d->arch.vgic.pending_irqs = > > > xzalloc_array(struct pending_irq, d->arch.vgic.nr_lines); > > > for (i=0; i<d->arch.vgic.nr_lines; i++) > > > + { > > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&d->arch.vgic.pending_irqs[i].inflight); > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&d->arch.vgic.pending_irqs[i].lr_queue); > > > + } > > > for (i=0; i<DOMAIN_NR_RANKS(d); i++) > > > spin_lock_init(&d->arch.vgic.shared_irqs[i].lock); > > > return 0; > > > @@ -99,7 +102,10 @@ int vcpu_vgic_init(struct vcpu *v) > > > > > > memset(&v->arch.vgic.pending_irqs, 0, > > > sizeof(v->arch.vgic.pending_irqs)); > > > for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) > > > + { > > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&v->arch.vgic.pending_irqs[i].inflight); > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&v->arch.vgic.pending_irqs[i].lr_queue); > > > + } > > > printk("vcpu_vgic_init irq[0] at %p desc is %p\n", > > > &v->arch.vgic.pending_irqs[0], > > > v->arch.vgic.pending_irqs[0].desc); > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |