Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] xl doesn't honour the parameter cpu_weight from my config file while xm does honour it

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 20:35 +0100, Dieter Bloms wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 24, Dieter Bloms wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > 
> > > Perhaps it would be better to have a single sched_params struct which
> > > contained all the parameters needed for any scheduler, and simply have
> > > them ignored by libxl for schedulers we're not using.
> 
> ...
> 
> > Anyway I think it is a good design to have one struct with all parameters
> > and I'am willing to implement it.
> 
> I've made a new patch.
> Maybe it fit all your needs.

Thanks, this patch look good to me, I'll leave it to IanJ to decide
which approach he prefers.

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel