[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [v2] xen: Add FS and GS base to HVM VCPU context
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 24.04.12 at 01:16, Aravindh Puthiyaparambil <aravindh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >> Add FS and GS base to the HVM VCPU context returned by xc_vcpu_getcontext() >> >> Signed-off-by: Aravindh Puthiyaparambil <aravindh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> diff -r 6ef297a3761f -r f7a1633867bf xen/arch/x86/domctl.c >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c Mon Apr 23 15:16:34 2012 -0700 >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c Mon Apr 23 16:12:50 2012 -0700 >> @@ -1590,8 +1590,17 @@ void arch_get_info_guest(struct vcpu *v, >> c.nat->user_regs.es = sreg.sel; >> hvm_get_segment_register(v, x86_seg_fs, &sreg); >> c.nat->user_regs.fs = sreg.sel; >> +#ifdef __x86_64__ >> + c.nat->fs_base = sreg.base; >> +#endif >> hvm_get_segment_register(v, x86_seg_gs, &sreg); >> c.nat->user_regs.gs = sreg.sel; >> +#ifdef __x86_64__ >> + if ( ring_0(&c.nat->user_regs) ) >> + c.nat->gs_base_kernel = sreg.base; >> + else >> + c.nat->gs_base_user = sreg.base; >> +#endif > > Which still leaves one of gs_base_* unfilled in all cases. You'll need > to get ahold of vmcb->kerngsbase (AMD/SVM) or > v->arch.hvm_vmx.shadow_gs (Intel/VMX). You could either > introduce a new wrapper, or expose {svm,vmx}_save_cpu_state() > as a new function table entry, or pay the price of calling > ->save_cpu_ctxt(). But you will need to pay extra attention to > the case of the subject vCPU being current. OK, I will try introducing a new wrapper that will return vmcb->kerngsbase / v->arch.hvm_vmx.shadow_gs. Thanks, Aravindh >> } >> else >> { >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |