[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 2] Support for Paging/Sharing on AMD
> On Thu, Mar 29, Tim Deegan wrote: > >> That is, can we just drop this whole test? > > I'm ok with removing the existing boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor test, > check only hap_enabled() and return -ENODEV otherwise. > > A recent change added need_iommu() check, this should be moved up into > the -ENODEV case becasue -EXDEV is for PoD. That was me. Either it has to be lumped with ENODEV or EXDEV. I considered that EXDEV is the right answer. Both PoD and iommu are Xor cases with another DEV. As opposed to no support at all (ENODEV) Andres > > Olaf > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |