Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: Still TODO for 4.2? xl domain numa memory allocation vs xm/xend

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 12:04 +0000, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 11:54 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: 

> > > Of course, even in such mode, if the user explicitly tells us what he
> > > wants, e.g., by means of cpupools, pinning, etc., we should still honour
> > > such request.
> > 
> > Do we get this right now?
> > 
> Sorry, not sure what you mean here...

I meant is "if the user explicitly tells us what he wants, e.g., by
means of cpupools, pinning, etc." do we still honour such request?

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel