[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/5] xen/pciback: Expand the warning message to include domain id.
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 03:51:25PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 15:03 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 08:38:09AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > >>> On 05.01.12 at 01:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > >>> wrote: > > > > When a PCI device is transferred to another domain and it is still > > > > in usage (from the internal perspective), mention which other > > > > domain is using it to aid in debugging. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/xen/xen-pciback/xenbus.c | 6 ++++-- > > > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/xenbus.c > > > > b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/xenbus.c > > > > index 474d52e..fa130bd 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/xenbus.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/xenbus.c > > > > @@ -243,8 +243,10 @@ static int xen_pcibk_export_device(struct > > > > xen_pcibk_device *pdev, > > > > dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "registering for %d\n", > > > > pdev->xdev->otherend_id); > > > > if (xen_register_device_domain_owner(dev, > > > > pdev->xdev->otherend_id) > > > > != 0) { > > > > - dev_err(&dev->dev, "device has been assigned to another > > > > " \ > > > > - "domain! Over-writting the ownership, but > > > > beware.\n"); > > > > + int other_domain = xen_find_device_domain_owner(dev); > > > > + dev_err(&dev->dev, "device has been assigned to %d " \ > > > > + "domain! Over-writting the ownership, but > > > > beware.\n", > > > > + other_domain); > > > > > > As you're touching this anyway, how about fixing the other minor > > > issues with it too? E.g. > > > > > > dev_err(&dev->dev, "Device appears to be assigned to dom%d!" > > > " Overwriting the ownership, but beware.\n", > > > xen_find_device_domain_owner(dev)); > > > > > > (a native English speaker may want to comment the "but beware" > > > part - it reads odd for me). > > > > Hm, lets ask the English speakers. Ian? > > I think you underestimate a native speakers ability to mangle a > language. Especially this one ;-) > > Anyway, I think it's unnecessary, so you may as well drop it and just > have: > > dev_err(&dev->dev, "Device appears to be assigned to dom%d!" > " Overwriting the ownership.\n", > xen_find_device_domain_owner(dev)); > > I suppose you might want "Overriding ownership to dom%d". OK. To the point and potentially can fit in 80 lines :-). Will spin out the patch next week-sih. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |