[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbus and the message of doom

To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:27:08 +0100
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:28:00 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Wed, Jan 04, Ian Campbell wrote:

> I think the toolstack needs to be involved with this. IOW this should be
> done in libxl__domain_make() around the same place as
> control/platform-feature-multiprocessor-suspend is written.

Isnt XS_RESET_WATCHES a feature of xenstored, so it should add its own stuff 
itself?

Olaf

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] xenbus and the message of doom
  - From: Ian Campbell

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] xenbus and the message of doom
  - From: Olaf Hering
- Re: [Xen-devel] xenbus and the message of doom
  - From: Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] xenbus and the message of doom
  - From: Olaf Hering
- Re: [Xen-devel] xenbus and the message of doom
  - From: Ian Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/8] xl.pod.1: improve documentation of FLASK commands
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] RFC: Still TODO for 4.2?
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] xenbus and the message of doom
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] xenbus and the message of doom
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.