[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: misc: xen-tmem-list-parse: fix output ugliness
Dan Magenheimer writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: misc: xen-tmem-list-pars> No, it doesn't. I agree it *could* if parse_string is > used/called differently. The caller simply needs to > ensure that the declared buffer is at least one larger > than the data to be matched which is true for both > callers. Urgh. So in the previous code the buffer was a byte too big ? I think functions with prototypes like f(int len, char *buf) should take buf[len], not buf[len+1]. > P.S. Please note that I am still not receiving email > >from the xen-devel reflector (and am on vacation this > week so probably won't be looking into it... my best > guess is that the Oracle spam filter isn't happy with > the new source of the xen-devel messages, as some > other Oracle folk are having problems too). Hrmm. If this is still a problem when you get back please let me know. ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |