[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.1-testing test] 9805: regressions - FAIL

To: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:42:26 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Keir \(Xen.org\)" <keir@xxxxxxx>, Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:43:02 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Sander Eikelenboom writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.1-testing test] 9805: 
regressions - FAIL"):
> Don't know how much room (time wise) the machines that do the automated 
> testing have, but additional tests based on latest 3.x and/or konrad's 
> linux-next branch should perhaps be considered ?

Yes.  This is right at the top of my todo list, except for all the
other things that are even more urgent/important...

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.1-testing test] 9805: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Stefan Bader
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.1-testing test] 9805: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.1-testing test] 9805: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Sander Eikelenboom

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Avoid panic when adjusting sedf parameters
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Avoid panic when adjusting sedf parameters
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.1-testing test] 9805: regressions - FAIL
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.1-testing test] 9805: regressions - FAIL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.