[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.1-testing test] 9805: regressions - FAIL
Hello Keir, Thursday, November 17, 2011, 11:37:01 AM, you wrote: > On 17/11/2011 10:28, "Stefan Bader" <stefan.bader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Hm, yes we should. I am pretty sure I hit that code path often enough, >>>> Wonder >>>> why I never saw any dead lock there... >>> >>> Perhaps your dom0 kernel doesn't register a pirq_eoi_map. >>> >> Would be the only explanation. And quite possible. Heck, I would need to know >> what that is used for anyway. :/ The kernel is 3.0 based the interrupt I was >> looking at just was a normal apic emulated through events one... > Our automated tests still use 2.6.32. It wouldn't surprise me if upstream > Linux 3 doesn't have the pirq_eoi_map stuff; it's an optimisation rather > than core absolutely-required functionality. Don't know how much room (time wise) the machines that do the automated testing have, but additional tests based on latest 3.x and/or konrad's linux-next branch should perhaps be considered ? Especially since they upstream path is getting more and more feature complete and usable. -- Sander > It's the dom0 PV kernel that matters in this case by the way, not the kernel > that you are running in HVM mode as a domU. > -- Keir -- Best regards, Sander mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |