[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] remove unneeded test for cpu in cpupool


  • To: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:14:27 +0000
  • Cc: "Przywara, Andre" <Andre.Przywara@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 04:15:26 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=lG9Um70gdiT37yOksH8RTc5V/0kL+tYmLexjAeZHs1Fa/Ujd9U/pY1f6U7CObfNcPK LEW5yYgOddi+lQFi+T5idPhhPpKuY7cy0jD15Mk4/ISxFcXYpWAzB/v1uXrnadN1Bb2/ nw9X1KvbNjehTJUzl1dNPSLib9B1Rwr/eKsNk=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Acvjy0/8D0oD7et1uUO/erKTrchfMw==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [Patch] remove unneeded test for cpu in cpupool

On 16/03/2011 10:36, "Juergen Gross" <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 03/16/11 11:13, Keir Fraser wrote:
>> On 16/03/2011 06:34, "Juergen Gross"<juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> attached patch removes an unneeded check in vcpu_migrate().
>>> 
>>> Andre, could you please give it a try on your 48 core machine with
>>> 
>>> xl cpupool-numa-split
>>> 
>>> I'd like to make sure the check is really not needed. On my machines it
>>> worked
>>> okay, but your machine seems to trigger races more easily.
>> 
>> Could you BUG_ON failing this test when we exit the retry loop? It seems a
>> suitable loop post-condition.
> 
> Not easily. The cpu_valid mask of a cpupool might change between the call of
> pick_cpu and the test. In the normal case this is okay, as removing a cpu
> from a cpupool (which is the critical case) will call cpu_disable_scheduler()
> after removing the cpu from the mask, which will migrate the vcpu away.
> 
> Using a saved copy of cpu_valid for the test isn't working either, if a cpu
> is added to and removed from the cpupool in a very short time. I would have
> to use a generation count for the cpu_valid mask and do the check only if
> the count didn't change. I think this is little bit of overkill here, but if
> you'd prefer it, I can do a patch.

Ah no, if it's more subtle than it appears, and it's not a straighjtforward
post-condition, then I wouldn't bother.

 -- Keir

> 
> Juergen



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.