[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 7/8] xen/mmu: Introduce IDENTITY_FRAME_BIT
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 04:26:15PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 19:48 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > @@ -52,9 +53,12 @@ static inline unsigned long pfn_to_mfn(unsigned long pfn) > > > > mfn = get_phys_to_machine(pfn); > > > > - if (mfn != INVALID_P2M_ENTRY) > > + if (mfn != INVALID_P2M_ENTRY) { > > mfn &= ~FOREIGN_FRAME_BIT; > > > > + if (mfn & IDENTITY_FRAME_BIT) > > + mfn &= ~IDENTITY_FRAME_BIT; > > + } > > I don't think the inner-if buys us anything here and the whole thing is > equivalent to: > if (mfn != INVALID_P2M_ENTRY) > mfn &= ~(FOREIGN_FRAME_BIT|IDENTITY_FRAME_BIT); > > Not sure if the FOREIGN_FRAME_BIT|IDENTITY_FRAME_BIT construct gets > enough use to be worthy of a #define FRAME_TYPE_MASK etc. Yeah, that is much better. > > > return mfn; > > } > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c > > index d98bd43..d470435 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c > > @@ -425,10 +425,10 @@ unsigned long get_phys_to_machine(unsigned long pfn) > > * would be wrong. > > */ > > if (p2m_top[topidx] == p2m_mid_identity) > > - return pfn; > > + return pfn | IDENTITY_FRAME_BIT; > > It's probably worth defining IDENTITY_FRAME(m) in the pattern of > FOREIGN_FRAME(m). <nods> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |