Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2061: regressions - FAIL

[Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Friday, 03 September 2010 at 18:41, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Brendan Cully writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2061: 
> regressions - FAIL"):
> > Or, instead of removing features, maybe your test scripts could just
> > not use -j4, or explicitly build the kernel first, until Jeremy gets
> > around to doing the merge?
> 
> Not using -j4 is out of the question.  And I don't want to make the
> situation with building kernels out of the xen tree in my test system
> any worse than it is already.  I'm intending to get rid of that
> entirely.  Hopefully we can get rid of it in xen-unstable at some
> point too.

Until the kernel modules are in their proper place, I think a less
drastic fix for your test suites would be to edit
tools/remus/kmod/Makefile and change

test -d $(KERNELDIR)

to

test -f $(KERNELDIR)/Module.symvers

which will still silently fail to build the modules if tools/remus
builds too early, but should suppress failure warnings. Completely
untested.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel