Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2061: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Brendan Cully writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2061: regressions 
- FAIL"):
> Or, instead of removing features, maybe your test scripts could just
> not use -j4, or explicitly build the kernel first, until Jeremy gets
> around to doing the merge?

Not using -j4 is out of the question.  And I don't want to make the
situation with building kernels out of the xen tree in my test system
any worse than it is already.  I'm intending to get rid of that
entirely.  Hopefully we can get rid of it in xen-unstable at some
point too.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel