RE: [Pkg-xen-devel] [Xen-devel] xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Lenovo R61, kernel boots on baremetel, no boot with xen4 hypervisor‏

[Mike Viau <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:21:52 +0100 <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Although Squeeze is 2.6.32 based it is carrying a backport of the 2.6.33
> (I think) DRM code. I think this means it has KMS although I'm not even
> 80% sure on that...
>
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:08:21AM -0400, Mike Viau wrote:
> >
> > http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenPVOPSDRM
> >
> > But it might be that those patches are already in the source tree that
> > you are using.
> >
> > If you know how to search for patches that were compiled in an Debian
> > kernel, try looking for these:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/devel/kms.fixes-0.5
>
> Hmm, I think that was among the stuff which was deliberately excluded
> from the Squeeze kernel by the Debian maintainer.
> (See this threa d:
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/2010-August/002918.html )
>
> I have put a version of the 2.6.32-21 package which reinstates those
> changes at <http://www.hellion.org.uk/debian/test/> which it would be
> useful to test. (actually the upload is ongoing, I'm betting on the
> timezones allowing it to complete before you see this ;-))
>
> The packages are otherwise identical to the 2.6.32-21 package currently
> in Sid.
>
> Ian.


Yup I can see the debs, what should I add to my sources.list? I found the public key from your website already :)


-M

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel