RE: [Pkg-xen-devel] [Xen-devel] xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Lenovo R61, kernel boots on baremetel, no boot with xen4 hypervisor‏

[Mike Viau <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:44:14 -0400 <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:16:17AM -0400, Mike Viau wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:39:51 +0100 <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sid kernel would be most interesting first off, I think.
> > >
> > > Ian.
> >
> > Same behaviors after updating the three packages: xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64, linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64, and linux-base (2.6.32-21).
> >
> > apt-cache policy xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
> > xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64:
> > Installed: 2.6.32-21
> > Candidate: 2.6.32-21
> > Version table:
> > *** 2.6.32-21 0
> > 500 http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca sid/main Packages
> > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> > 2.6.32-20 0
> > 990 http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca squeeze/main Packages
> >
> > apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
> > linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64:
> > Installed: 2.6.32-21
> > Candidate: 2.6.32-21
> > Version table:
> > *** 2.6.32-21 0
> > 500 http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca sid/main Packages
> > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> > 2.6.32-20 0
> > 990 http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca squeeze/main Packages
> >
> > apt-cache policy linux-base
> > linux-base:
> > Installed: 2.6.32-21
> > Candidate: 2.6.32-21
> > Version table:
> > *** 2.6.32-21 0
> > 500 http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca sid/main Packages
> > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> > 2.6.32-20 0
> > 990 http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca squeeze/main Packages
> >
> > Bare-metal or with hypervisor does not boot with nomodeset on the kernel cmdline.
> >
> > Just for troubleshooting purpose the current default Debian squeeze kernel linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 (2.6.32-20) also does not boot when nomodeset is set on the kernel cmdline.
> >
>
> Well, 'nomodeset' I don't think will help b/c you don't have KMS in
> squeeze (I believe so).
>

I really am not sure either, but I do see KMS messages in my kernel log, see attached nouveau-crash.txt

> The other thing is that you have:
> Aug 21 09:08:27 BUBBLE kernel: [ 5.046676] NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX
> x86_64 Kernel Module 173.14.25 Thu Jan 28 01:53:43 PST
>
> the proprietary NVidia driver loaded. We haven't tried those
> yet and instead focused on making sure the upstream nouveau drivers
> work with Xen. Which they do now.
>

Right, so I r emoved the nvidia driver and used the KMS/Nouveau driver, but the system does not boot still.

> I would suggest you boot in runlevel 3, so that X is not started and see
> if the machine works (as in, you don't see other failures).
>

I would like to, but I enlisted in some suggestion (from Pasi) on how to temporarily boot my system without X... My system defaults to run level 2 which apparently starts gdm3 and then gnome DE anyways.

> And if you want X and the NVidia driver (the proprietary one), you might
> need to take the brunt of debugging it and finding where the NVidia is
> doing some weird stuff.
>

I don't really care for the enchanced 3d features offered by the nvidia drivers anyway. Good video playback and multi-screen support is more important for me.

> Or, there is another option, and that to use a back-ported version of
> 2.6.34 DRM/KMS/TTM driversets which include the nouveau suppor t.
> (I am right now running with that on a GeForce 8600 GT on Xen 4.1 +
> latest PVOPS kernel).
>

According to http://www.backports.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=packages

There are only back ports for lenny or etch, could you please elaborate your set and how one might mimic what you have done using Debian squeeze?

Thanks


-M

Attachment: nouveau-crash.txt
Description: Text document

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel