[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] need for ClearPageReserved() in blktap2 code
Jake, Dutch, while I can see the need for this on the ring pages, I have some difficulty understanding why it needs to be invoked on the individual data pages as they get removed from ring->foreign_map.map: I understand that SetPageReserved() when inserting them is needed (or at least desirable) since in the 2.6.18 and pv-ops trees the balloon driver doesn't guarantee pages being returned from alloc_empty_pages_and_page_vec() are marked reserved (which minimally I consider an inconsistency). In our trees, the balloon driver does guarantee this, but it expects the pages to also be returned in reserved state - which blktap2 breaks because of the arbitrary(?) clearing of the flag. The question hence really is whether that clearing is really necessary, i.e. whether the pages, when not in some ring->foreign_map.map[], validly and reasonably can (should) be considered non-reserved - to me it appears there's no need for this. Thanks for letting my know your thoughts on this, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |