[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] mce_wrmsr() and (at least) HVM guests
>>> "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> 04.01.10 09:31 >>> >>>And also another potential issue raised out. For example, guest has >>>clear one bit in MCn_CTL while physically it is enabled. If a error >>>corresponding to this bit really happen, at least we should not inject >>>a vMCE to guest. We will either kill the guest, or let the guest >>>continues, depends on the error type . >> >>Yes, this would make sense, albeit it seems overkill to me - there >>shouldn't really be disagreement in how specific models get handled. >>Instead, perhaps an unprivileged guest should be permitted to write >>zero bits wherever the underlying real register has them clear (as >>read back from hardware, not as written by Xen or dom0). > >What do you mean of "write zero bits wherever the underlying real >register has them clear"? Writing e.g. all 1s into any of these registers doesn't mean you'd read back all 1s. Hence, writing zero into read-only (always zero) bits should be permitted as well as writing zero into bits that dom0 cleared explicitly. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |