[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] libxenlight: implement libxl_set_memory_target
Oh, I'm working with an old changeset. Yikes. Thanks, Andres Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote:Errrr, no.http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-unstable.hg?file/8f304c003af4/tools/libxl/libxl.c shows that the videoram node will be set only if we are using a device-model. And specifically if we are in fully virtualized mode, i.e. dm_info->type == XENFV, i.e. *not* PVI understand that this can be confusing, but at the moment we have two videoram parameters: dm_info->videoram is for the device model while b_info->video_memkb is for domain building. If you look at init_dm_info, you'll see that dm_info->videoram is set from b_info->video_memkb. Also if you read libxl_dom.c:build_post you'll see that no matter if the guest is a pv or an hvm domain, memory/videoram will be written to xenstore anyway. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |