[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 support in xen-unstable?

To: Chris Lalancette <clalance@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:23:24 +0100
Cc:
Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 08:25:05 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Thread-index: Acn+RK9CrTL9BP0rS9myzcxvVRP5GQACQSU6
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 support in xen-unstable?

On 06/07/2009 15:18, "Chris Lalancette" <clalance@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> However, looking at arch/x86/mm.c:mod_l4_entry(), it returns 0 on success and
> <
> 0 on error.  It seems to me that booting a 32-bit PV guest is always going to
> fall into the !okay check on success, when it really shouldn't.

You didn't spot the '== 0' tacked on the end of that long ternary
expression?

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 support in xen-unstable?
  - From: Chris Lalancette

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] Xen pv kernel (2.6.30) causes s2ram to crash with segmentation fault
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] When will Xen 3.5 be released?
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 support in xen-unstable?
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] When will Xen 3.5 be released?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.