[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 support in xen-unstable?
Hello, I've been browsing through the preemptible pagetable stuff, and ran across a piece of code that I don't understand or is buggy. Looking at arch/x86/mm.c:new_guest_cr3(), we have this code for 32-on-64 support: if ( is_pv_32on64_domain(d) ) { okay = paging_mode_refcounts(d) ? 0 /* Old code was broken, but what should it be? */ : mod_l4_entry( __va(pagetable_get_paddr(curr->arch.guest_table)), l4e_from_pfn( mfn, (_PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_RW|_PAGE_USER|_PAGE_ACCESSED)), pagetable_get_pfn(curr->arch.guest_table), 0, 0, curr) == 0; if ( unlikely(!okay) ) { MEM_LOG("Error while installing new compat baseptr %lx", mfn); return 0; } However, looking at arch/x86/mm.c:mod_l4_entry(), it returns 0 on success and < 0 on error. It seems to me that booting a 32-bit PV guest is always going to fall into the !okay check on success, when it really shouldn't. Shouldn't this be something like: okay = paging_mode_refcounts(d) ? 0 /* Old code was broken, but what should it be? */ : !mod_l4_entry( __va(pagetable_get_paddr(curr->arch.guest_table)), l4e_from_pfn( mfn, (_PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_RW|_PAGE_USER|_PAGE_ACCESSED)), pagetable_get_pfn(curr->arch.guest_table), 0, 0, curr) == 0; Or am I just missing something? (NOTE: this still leaves open the possibility for failure if mod_l4_entry() returns EINTR or EAGAIN, but maybe we don't have to worry about that here?) Thanks, -- Chris Lalancette _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |