[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8
M A Young wrote: That's strange because it wasn't when I sent it. I wonder if it got mangled in-transit. It was an attachment, so it should have been resistant. Though it also had a '\0' on the end for good measure. Unfortunately this didn't help me; it still ended up making this 'm', which doesn't work. The simple fix is, I think, to make this a "bool", so it gets built in. Its not really big enough to bother with.I have been using XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND=m on some of my kernels so it didn't cause me a problem, though of course if any of the dependent modules were "y" then that would indeed be incorrect. I did have an alternate way of doing it that I could try. Hm. I wonder if there's a bunch of symbol exports missing. Or perhaps it's a secondary problem, like mkinitrd is not putting the right modules in place. J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |