[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] A useless short jmp?
>> According to Intel Spec, it's useless, do we have any >special reason to >> have it there? >> BTW why put mov $1, %bl between lmsw and it's corresponding ljmp? > >Hmmm... I'm sure I read somewhere about a jmp to clear the >prefetch queue, Surely you did read it :-), in the latest Spec (version of May 2007), in17.29.3 Enabling and Disabling Paging, it's said a near jump should be executed after set or clear PG flag in CR0, but it's a different case since we are setting or clearing PE flag, probably plus PG changes too. -Xin >but reading the appropriate manual pages now I see I only need >the ljmp. >I'll fix that and also move the write to %bx somewhere more sensible. > > Thanks, > Keir > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |