[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xenoprof passive domain support
>Do you have a more recent patch for this? I'm having a hard time sorting out >the rejects, particularly the ones related to xenoprof-generic.patch. (I'm >working against change set 10031.) Renato sent me something called >xenoprof3.patch (could have been his name for this patch), but that could >have just been his name for it. > >Particularly confusing are the changes related to CPU_MODE_XEN in >add_kernel_ctx_swtich(). There's no case statement there at all anymore, >just an "if (in_kernel)" statement. And all I find in oprofile.h are >#defines's for CPU_IS_KERNEL, CPU_TRACE_BEGIN... > >Any help would be appreciated. > >Which change set were your patches of 4/28 against? > Ray, My last patch is against 9872, which is sent out 5/6. The strange thing you met may be due to the failure of applying the patch to a newer changeset. Renato is reviewing the patch. After that, I can port it the latest. Thanks, Xiaowei _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |