[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] FreeBSD boot loader on VT-x based Xen system
Folks --I'm trying to run FreeBSD 6.0 on a VT-x based Xen system. I'm experiencing a problem where the boot loader is crashing before the FreeBSD kernel (proper) is loaded. The sequence of operations is that the VMX domain is constructed, the BIOS is executed, GRUB loads, I type the instructions to load FreeBSD (a boot loader) and that code begins to execute and then crashes. Here's a console log that we captured: GNU GRUB version 0.95 (638K lower / 261112K upper memory)[ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possiblecompletions of a device/filename.] grub> root (hd0,1,a) Filesystem type is ufs2, partition type 0xa5 grub> kernel /boot/loader[FreeBSD-a.out, loadaddr=0x200000, text=0x1000, data=0x32000, bss=0x0, entry =0x200000]grub> boot BTX loader 1.00 Starting in protected mode (base mem=9fc00) Arguments passed (esp=67e88): <howto=80000000 bootdev=a0300000 junk=0 0 0 bootinfo=67ec4> Relocated bootinfo (size=48) to 9fbb8 Relocated arguments (size=18) to 9fba0 BTX version is 1.01 Relocated kernel (size=780) to 9000 Client base address is a000 Client format is ELF text segment: offset=1000 vaddr=0 filesz=2a3b0 memsz=2a3b0 data segment: offset=2c000 vaddr=2c000 filesz=53cc memsz=b4c0 Loading complete int=0000000d err=00000000 efl=00010006 eip=000090ac eax=00094c00 ebx=00202820 ecx=00000033 edx=0000a000 esi=00209701 edi=00001f98 ebp=0000a000 esp=000017f0 cs=0008 ds=0000 es=0000 fs=0020 gs=0020 ss=0010 cs:eip=ff 35 0c 90 00 00 51 51-51 51 52 b1 07 6a 00 e2 fc 61 07 1f 0f a1 0f a9-cf fa bc 00 18 00 00 0f ss:esp=2b 00 00 00 02 02 00 00-00 4c 09 00 33 00 00 00 0a 69 6e 74 3d 30 30 30-30 30 30 30 64 20 20 65 BTX halted The instructions that were being executed can be found, in a FreeBSD source tree, at: /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/btx/btx/btx.S Here they are for your perusal: .code32 init.8: xorl %ecx,%ecx # Zero movb $SEL_SDATA,%cl # To 32-bit movw %cx,%ss # stack /* * Launch user task. */ movb $SEL_TSS,%cl # Set task ltr %cx # register movl $MEM_USR,%edx # User base address movzwl %ss:BDA_MEM,%eax # Get free memory shll $0xa,%eax # To bytes subl $0x1000,%eax # Less arg space subl %edx,%eax # Less base movb $SEL_UDATA,%cl # User data selector pushl %ecx # Set SS pushl %eax # Set ESP push $0x202 # Set flags (IF set) push $SEL_UCODE # Set CS pushl btx_hdr+0xc # Set EIPThe error occurs with the last instruction shown above: pushl btx_hdr +0xc. Here's a disassembly of those instructions: 0000907f (02) 31c9 XOR ECX, ECX 00009081 (02) b1 10 MOV CL, 0x10 00009083 (02) 8ed1 MOV SS, CX 00009085 (02) b1 38 MOV CL, 0x38 00009087 (03) 0f00d9 LTR CX 0000908a (05) ba 00a00000 MOV EDX, 0xa000 0000908f (08) 36 0fb705 13040000 MOVZX EAX, SS:[0x413] 00009097 (03) c1e0 0a SHL EAX, 0xa 0000909a (05) 2d 00100000 SUB EAX, 0x1000 0000909f (02) 29d0 SUB EAX, EDX 000090a1 (02) b1 33 MOV CL, 0x33 000090a3 (01) 51 PUSH ECX 000090a4 (01) 50 PUSH EAX 000090a5 (05) 68 02020000 PUSH 0x202 000090aa (02) 6a 2b PUSH 0x2b 000090ac (06) ff35 0c000000 PUSH DWORD [0xc]And, we can see that the instruction stream at 90ac matches the instruction stream in the eip dump in the exception display. (Note that I'm disassembling the btx.o file, and so the linker has not fixed up the reference to btx_hdr+0xc to be 900c, instead we're seeing just 0xc. Note too, that this explains why I believe I can replace the reference to btx_hdr+0xc with an explicit reference to the code segment register; see below.) My guess is that there's a bug in VMXAssist. I'd like some corroboration of that point, if possible. In fact, because the code had long jumped to the above code sequence to enter 32bit mode, are we still in VMXAssist? Or have we entered into pure execution mode? It appears that the problem is based on an incorrect data segment register value. The code segment register contains 8, which points to a valid code segment descriptor. But, the ds register is 0, and that's never good. How or why this code works on real hardware is undoubtedly a side effect of ... I dunno a bug, legacy, or a design that's not clear to me. At any rate, If I replace the push instruction with: pushl %cs:btx_hdr+0xcreferencing the code segment selector, then we get past the exception noted above and into our next problem. I'm just curious about this particular bug. Can somebody lend some insight or direction in tracking this down? I'm more than happy to do lots of leg work on tracking this down, but a little direction would go a long way to help. -- Randy _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |