Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/2 VCPU creation and allocation

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10 Oct 2005, at 17:23, Ryan Harper wrote:

> OK, that makes sense.  I'll turn VCPUOP_create into set_max_vcpus(max)
> which will create vcpus 1-(max-1).  Any preference on the hypercall
> name?  Does set_max_vcpus() still make sense if it is also creating
> vcpus?
>
> How about DOM0_CREATEVCPUS and
>     do_createvcpus(struct domain* d, unsigned int max_vcpus).
I'm not fussed. I guess I have a slight preference for the latter 
(createvcpus).
 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel