Re: [Xen-devel] x86_64/entry.S:317: Error: `1(%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index

[David F Barrera <dfbp@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 21:53 +0200, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:59:00AM -0500, David F Barrera wrote:
> > Using the May 17 xen-unstable-src.tgz on x86_64, the following error
> > occurs on a SLES 9 SP1 platform (It builds OK on Fedora Core 4, but it
> > does not boot, and that is another issue):                          
> > 
> > gcc -nostdinc -fno-builtin -fno-common -fno-strict-aliasing -iwithprefix 
> > include
> > -Wall -Werror -Wno-pointer-arith -pipe -I/tmp/xen-unstable/xen/include
> > -I/tmp/xen-unstable/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-default -O3 
> > -fomit-frame-pointer
> > -msoft-float -m64 -mno-red-zone -fpic -fno-reorder-blocks
> > -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -DNDEBUG -D__ASSEMBLY__ -c x86_64/entry.S -o
> > x86_64/entry.o
> > x86_64/entry.S: Assembler messages:
> > x86_64/entry.S:317: Error: `1(%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index
> > expressionx86_64/entry.S:320: Error: `136+8(%esp)' is not a valid 64 bit
> > base/index expression
> 
> that's odd. could you verify you have the correct line on entry.S ?
They seem different. I am using the May 17 xen-unstable-src.tgz file.
> 
> line 317: setnz VCPUINFO_upcall_mask(%rax)
I have: 
setnz VCPUINFO_upcall_mask(%eax)# TBF_INTERRUPT -> clear upcall mask

> line 320: movw  UREGS_cs+8(%rsp),%ax
I have:
movw  UREGS_cs+8(%esp),%ax      # Bits  0-15: CS


> 
> as well, what compiler version are you using ?

gcc version 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux): 


-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel