[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] x86_64/entry.S:317: Error: `1(%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index
The fix for this is in bitkeeper now. It did not make it into the unstable tar ball for the night. So you will not see this problem tommorow. On 5/18/05, Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:59:00AM -0500, David F Barrera wrote: > > Using the May 17 xen-unstable-src.tgz on x86_64, the following error > > occurs on a SLES 9 SP1 platform (It builds OK on Fedora Core 4, but it > > does not boot, and that is another issue): > > > > gcc -nostdinc -fno-builtin -fno-common -fno-strict-aliasing -iwithprefix > > include > > -Wall -Werror -Wno-pointer-arith -pipe -I/tmp/xen-unstable/xen/include > > -I/tmp/xen-unstable/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-default -O3 > > -fomit-frame-pointer > > -msoft-float -m64 -mno-red-zone -fpic -fno-reorder-blocks > > -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -DNDEBUG -D__ASSEMBLY__ -c x86_64/entry.S -o > > x86_64/entry.o > > x86_64/entry.S: Assembler messages: > > x86_64/entry.S:317: Error: `1(%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index > > expressionx86_64/entry.S:320: Error: `136+8(%esp)' is not a valid 64 bit > > base/index expression > > that's odd. could you verify you have the correct line on entry.S ? > > line 317: setnz VCPUINFO_upcall_mask(%rax) > line 320: movw UREGS_cs+8(%rsp),%ax > > as well, what compiler version are you using ? > > -- > Vincent Hanquez > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |