[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] PCI interrupt setup failure: gateway
Hi there, On Friday 06 May 2005 19:28, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > I'm seeing what appears to be an interrupt setup failure. It occurs both > in the current pre-FC4 xen RPM and also in the xen-unstable tree from > last night. I'm unable to pull from the bitkeeper repository -- Larry > McVoy denied us a license because we work on OpenCM and that competes > with Bitkeeper. Have you tried SourcePuller? http://sourceforge.net/projects/sourcepuller/ It's the notorious Tridge-designed BK client. It doesn't have the SCM functionality but should perhaps be sufficient to get the latest source out of BK? Or there's the BK open source client http://www.bitmover.com/bk-client.shar - this was originally under the "No Whiners License" but I think it's actually BSD licensed, or something similar. Anyhow, I stuck a tarball of the latest and greatest BK tree at: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/xen-devel-20050506-maw.bk.tar.bz2 It should contain the latest patches - maybe it will help. > Since I cannot get to the bitkeeper repository, I attempted to build and > run the latest xen-unstable tarball -- partly because that has some of > the new ACPI patches. This didn't help at all -- I suspect the problem > is that cardbus support may not exist in Xen yet. Xen doesn't let Linux see behind Cardbus bridges, so that wouldn't work. The new PCI / ACPI patches may support it, although I haven't tried. Cheers, Mark > However, I *did* notice that xen-unstable exhibits significantly reduced > function relative to the current FC4-devel RPM. X windows crashes, one > of the early setup tools in the boot process also crashes. Possibly > Jeremy's patches are not migrating back into the tree promptly? > > At the moment, I'ld appreciate some guidance on where to look. > > shap > > On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 02:35 +0100, Ian Pratt wrote: > > > I now have xen up from the FC4-- repository on two machines. > > > One works fine, the other is a very new amd64, and xen is > > > having trouble parsing the bios tables (therefore unable to > > > find the interrupt line for the enet controller). > > > > The ACPI patch went in to unstable.bk yesterday -- it would be very > > interesting to know whether it helped or made things worse. > > > > > I'm happy to instrument/debug, but who's the right contact > > > person? Can join xen-developers list if needed, but the > > > traffic is heavy... > > > > I'd prefer I you could post to xen-devel, even if you don't subscribe. > > > > Thanks, > > Ian > > > > > shap > > > > > > On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 05:26 +0100, Ian Pratt wrote: > > > > > > BTW: big ACPI support patch going in next week. Mightn't be > > > > > > > > > > too hard > > > > > > > > > > > to get power management working on top of it... > > > > > > > > > > Great. Now if only you would dump bitkeeper. One of the > > > > > > reasons that > > > > > > > > I have been unable to track the Xen project more closely > > > > > > is that I > > > > > > > > cannot install the bitkeeper client. Linus isn't the only > > > > > > person for > > > > > > > > whom Larry has made legal problems. > > > > > > > > We'll be putting up a CVS server of the head of the repository. > > > > > > > > Ian > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |