[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xenctld - a control channel multiplexing daemon
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 13:11, Andrew Warfield wrote: > > In reality, what's the different between a domain that's suspended to > > disk and a clone domain that just hasn't been started yet. > > > > Does the current persistent store architecture attempt to solve this > > problem? Does it attempt to solve both problems? > > No. There has been no discussion of storing suspended domains. For > the moment, i think it's probably best to design the store to contain > runtime state for the currently executing set of VMs on the physical > host. So records in the store are persistent across daemon restarts, > and dom0 restarts. Excellent! Then I have no worries at all about it. You mentioned the current design looks a lot like a file system, any thoughts on actually using the file system? Either within the normal file system (within something like /var/xen/<domid>) or as a pid-like /proc entry (like /proc/xen/<domid>). Regards, -- Anthony Liguori Linux Technology Center (LTC) - IBM Austin E-mail: aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx Phone: (512) 838-1208 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |