[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xenctld - a control channel multiplexing daemon
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 14:01 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 13:11, Andrew Warfield wrote: > > > In reality, what's the different between a domain that's suspended to > > > disk and a clone domain that just hasn't been started yet. > > > > > > Does the current persistent store architecture attempt to solve this > > > problem? Does it attempt to solve both problems? > > > > No. There has been no discussion of storing suspended domains. For > > the moment, i think it's probably best to design the store to contain > > runtime state for the currently executing set of VMs on the physical > > host. So records in the store are persistent across daemon restarts, > > and dom0 restarts. > > Excellent! Then I have no worries at all about it. > > You mentioned the current design looks a lot like a file system, any > thoughts on actually using the file system? Either within the normal > file system (within something like /var/xen/<domid>) or as a pid-like > /proc entry (like /proc/xen/<domid>). Wouldn't want to do this in the kernel (i.e., /proc or /sysfs) as it would not be persistent across dom0 restarts. In a regular filesystem as {directories, subdirectories, files} would be reasonable. In either case, persistent store would need to determine whether the entire system (Xen) has restarted, dom0 has restarted, or just the xend has restarted and clean up residual info appropriately. While beyond the current focus, persistent store could feasibly be used to hold domain definitions for non-existent domains and suspended domains. One could envision adding a state field into the domain configuration/definition. Valid states for current capabilities would be {active, suspended, migrated, inactive}. On the other hand, keeping persistent store info on only active domains in this mechanism and moving info to higher level tools about predefined domains, suspended domains, etc. would work. It's a tradeoff between similar info being maintained in multiple places, or added complexity in a single place. Michael > > Regards, -- Michael Hohnbaum 503 578 5486 hohnbaum@xxxxxxxxxx t/l 775 5486 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |