[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xenctld - a control channel multiplexing daemon
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Out of curiosity, why is that? Is it the storage overhead? Increasing > the number of processes? Or simply just the additional administrative > headache? more daemons means more things to get run when you least want them to run. It's just a good idea to keep the daemons to a minimum. Requiring a daemon to translate a unix domain socket to ip just strikes me as very unnecessary. But, I'm not writing it, so past a point I think you should ignore my requests if you don't like them :-) ron ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |