[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xenctld - a control channel multiplexing daemon
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 14:44, Ronald G. Minnich wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > It's not so much about whether there would be an IP interface at all, > > more about what's the lowest possible interface. A daemon that uses the > > domain socket interface could then export an IP interface. > > another daemon would be a concern. On these slave nodes, the fewer daemons > the better. Out of curiosity, why is that? Is it the storage overhead? Increasing the number of processes? Or simply just the additional administrative headache? > ron -- Anthony Liguori Linux Technology Center (LTC) - IBM Austin E-mail: aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx Phone: (512) 838-1208 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |