RE: [Xen-cim] [PATCH]move to changeset 14542

["Subrahmanian, Raj" <raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ewan, 

>> I have left two things open.
>> - I was not sure how to integrate with the vbd and vdi code that has 
>> come in. These sections of code were commented out with 
>VBD<->VDI issue.
>I don't know what this means.  Could you explain?
The earlier code just used a field called image to refer to the disk
image. That field has been moved to the vdi_record_opt structure, I
think. I haven't yet written the code to read this structure. 

>> - The upstream has not yet accepted the model info for vifs 
>patch that 
>> Jim sent out.
>
>Jim said that he would go and try a different approach 
>(putting the model info in a VIF.other_config dictionary), but 
>he hasn't yet come back to me with a new patch.
Cool.

>> This is just the first cut. I was not able to rigorously 
>test it since 
>> my hvm box is still under the 'old' xen. I am hoping that by sending 
>> it out, we will have more people working on it. With this, I can do 
>> some basic enumeration etc.
>> The big change between 14542 and the tip seems to be some change in 
>> the session handling code.
>
>Calls on the session class now take two session references -- 
>the first is the session that you're authenticating with, as 
>with any call, and the second is the session that you actually 
>want to talk about.  This will allow us (later) to have the 
>ability for superusers to inspect other people's sessions, for example.
>
>As far as you're concerned, just passing in the same session 
>handle twice should be all you need to do.
Thanks

Raj

_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim