Hi,
As far as I know, the main problems are: (1) the packages conflict (as you noticed); and (2) any separate modules compiled against the XS kernel probably need to be recompiled too.
Fundamentally the source of the XS and XCP RPMs should be (almost) identical. The license of all the xen packages (XS and XCP) and kernel packages (XS and XCP) should all be GPL, so you may redistribute them freely. If the RPMs work for you then it would be a really great if you could put them on the wiki somewhere for others.
Weâre hoping to unify the RPM packaging for as many XS and XCP components as possible so itâll be possible to use them interchangeably in future.
Thanks,
Dave
From: xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of George Shuklin
Sent: 14 June 2012 08:16
To: Carlos Eduardo Tavares Terra
Cc: xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-API] [XCP] CVE-2012-0217 - PV privilege escalation and XCP 1.1
Right now I do initial testing in laboratory for those rpms, but their installation in XCP seems be very ugly. XenServer xen-hypervisor package simply conflicts with native xcp's and was installed with --force option.
And I kinda worry about how well it all will operates...
On 14.06.2012 06:48, Carlos Eduardo Tavares Terra wrote:
Good question...
I have the same doubt...
--
Carlos Eduardo Tavares Terra
Red Hat Certified Engineer
Consultor em Infraestrutura de TI
GNU/Linux #413291 [http://counter.li.org]