Re: [Xen-API] RFC: Shuffling xen-api-libs

[Jonathan Ludlam <Jonathan.Ludlam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There's not much point in, e.g. the cpuid module being it's own findlib 
package. For some of the larger ones, there's a more reasonable argument (e.g. 
log). That's the whole point. Which modules do you feel should have their own 
findlib package?

Jon


On 28 Oct 2011, at 05:38, Vincent Hanquez wrote:

> On 10/27/2011 11:43 PM, Jonathan Ludlam wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> In order to get xen-api-libs into Debian, it's got to be in a reasonable 
>> state. I believe we're quite a long way off reasonable at the moment, so I'd 
>> just like to send out a Plan of Action to define how we're going to get from 
>> where we are to where we need to be.
> 
>> So, is this a crazy plan? Does anyone agree/disagree/have an opinion?
> 
> I think, that's sad that it's going in the wrong direction. module should 
> have a 
> chance to become useful in their own right, not be stuffed in a xapi-only 
> munbo 
> jumbo of modules. This nullify the splitting work too and somewhat goes 
> against 
> the debian way of packaging.
> 
> -- 
> Vincent
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xen-api mailing list
> xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api


_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api