[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-API] grub/cmdline
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 02:09:34PM +0000, Ewan Mellor wrote: > > I think 'entry' needs renaming as it's only really meaningful for a menu.lst > > based method. > > What would you want to call it? I was thinking that if you have a bootloader > with a menu, you'd use entry, and if you didn't, entry would be blank. Is > there something else that you'd want to use this field for? It isn't that I have something in mind particularly. It's just that, firstly, the legacy config has 'bootloader_args', and it seems kind of odd to map it to 'entry', and secondly, that we can't really predict how we'll be booting domains in 10 year's time. I agree it's just a quibble, but I don't see a problem in using 'bootloader_params' or 'bootloader_args'. > > Your description above doesn't cover the case where neither bootloader NOR > > kernel are set. With my changes, this uses the 'default' bootloader (namely > > pygrub). This needs spelling out in the API doc. > > I'd intended that this particular case would be a flagged error, and pygrub > would only ever be used if explicitly specified. I don't have a strong > opinion on that -- we could do it your way if you prefer. Well, the intention is that given a random domain, xend knows by default how to boot it, thus making the common case ("boot the default"/"give me grub menu") the natural default with no extra configuration needed. regards, john _______________________________________________ xen-api mailing list xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |