Re: [Wg-test-framework] Baroque 0/1 Status

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul L. George writes ("Re: Baroque 0/1 Status"):
> We only removed Baroque 1, and replaced the motherboard in the
> system.  We had to go to the latest updated versions of the BIOS and
> Chip set Firmware.  Ray took a picture of the motherboard before he
> removed the old board so the wiring would be correct.  Only after
> the update was completed did we pull Baroque 0 back from the COLO.
> We had to perform the same updates to make them identical.

How can you explain this, then:

> >                                 baroque0           baroque1
> > 
> > NIC1 MAC recorded in ansible,   00:1e:67:99:42:9d  00:1e:67:99:46:e4
> > from before hardware work (also
> > visible in old serial logs)
> > 
> > NIC1 MAC reported by BIOS,      00:1e:67:af:e4:34  00:1e:67:99:46:e4
> > now, after hardware work

?

Perhaps the labels on the two machines disagree with the physical
wiring.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Wg-test-framework mailing list
Wg-test-framework@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wg-test-framework