[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 13/13] Nested Virtualization: hap-on-hap
At 17:49 +0000 on 02 Dec (1291312156), Christoph Egger wrote:
> > My comments on why p2m_flush_locked() isn't enough to reclaim an in-use
> > p2m for recycling still stand.
> Can you point me to the mail in the ML archive you refer to, please?
It's the discussion at the end of this email:
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, Xen Platform Team
Citrix Systems UK Ltd. (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)
Xen-devel mailing list