[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xc_save: ignore the first suspend event channel notification
On 7/9/08 08:06, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I could certainly code this up as well (it'd need a static flag in >> evtchn_suspend as well to avoid resignalling the domain, I think). But >> generally without clearing the event channel before signalling the >> guest, the first suspend attempt will always return early. I'm not >> really clear on the scenario that results in the domain not being >> suspended after *suspend has succesfully returned. Could you clarify? > > I don't like the forced initial consumption of a single evtchn signal. I'd > like rid of that and change the retry loop to call (*suspend) instead. Add > an extra boolean to the static suspend_info structure to detect first > invocation of (*suspend) versus repeated invocations. Actually I can knock these changes together myself, so I'll do that, taking whatever bits of your patch are appropriate. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |