[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] CentOS 8.x: if your virt stack does not start with Xen you did it wrong
Hello xen-users, It is one year now after the C8 was released, what is the state of Xen dom0 and the Xen based Virt stack? Of course there is no official support from RH for Xen anymore, but there is a rumbling of Xen dom0 support coming from the Virt SIG. Once its done, it would appear in this tree: http://mirrors.oit.uci.edu/centos/8/virt/x86_64/ Here is a short writeup about the xen virt stack I did in April: http://lists.ghettoforge.org/pipermail/users/2020-April/000013.html What are some major changes from Xen builds in C7? To build/link EFI in C7 needed a build-requires (BR) on mingw64-binutils. However, C8 now includes EFI linking support in the native GNU (ld) loader in the binutils package - thus one less BR. C7 had a python package with python2 default. C8 has no such python package, only python2 or python3. It is possible to build and run any Xen from xen-4.12+ with python3. New in C8 is modularity, including the `virt module`, which is equivalent to a wrench in the fan, bringing all virt builds based on Xen to a screeching halt. As discussed in the GF-Users post this obstacle can be overcome. There is a reason that the Centos Virt SIG has stalled their Xen release. As shown there is a limited build in koji without any libvirt+ support. I know the whole Xen based stack is possible and how it can be done. cheers, PryMar55 Attachment:
info-virt8-xen
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |