[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-users] Xen Security Advisory 173 (CVE-2016-3960) - x86 shadow pagetables: address width overflow
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Xen Security Advisory CVE-2016-3960 / XSA-173 version 3 x86 shadow pagetables: address width overflow UPDATES IN VERSION 3 ==================== Public release. ISSUE DESCRIPTION ================= In the x86 shadow pagetable code, the guest frame number of a superpage mapping is stored in a 32-bit field. If a shadowed guest can cause a superpage mapping of a guest-physical address at or above 2^44 to be shadowed, the top bits of the address will be lost, causing an assertion failure or NULL dereference later on, in code that removes the shadow. IMPACT ====== A HVM guest using shadow pagetables can cause the host to crash. A PV guest using shadow pagetables (i.e. being migrated) with PV superpages enabled (which is not the default) can crash the host, or corrupt hypervisor memory, and so a privilege escalation cannot be ruled out. VULNERABLE SYSTEMS ================== Xen versions from 3.4 onwards are affected. Only x86 variants of Xen are susceptible. ARM variants are not affected. HVM guests using shadow mode paging can expose this vulnerability. HVM guests using Hardware Assisted Paging (HAP) are unaffected. Systems running PV guests with PV superpages enabled are vulnerable if those guests undergo live migration. PV superpages are disabled by default, so systems are not vulnerable in this way unless "allowsuperpage" is on the Xen command line. To discover whether your HVM guests are using HAP, or shadow page tables: request debug key `q' (from the Xen console, or with `xl debug-keys q'). This will print (to the console, and visible in `xl dmesg'), debug information for every domain, containing something like this: (XEN) General information for domain 2: (XEN) refcnt=1 dying=2 pause_count=2 (XEN) nr_pages=2 xenheap_pages=0 shared_pages=0 paged_pages=0 dirty_cpus={} max_pages=262400 (XEN) handle=ef58ef1a-784d-4e59-8079-42bdee87f219 vm_assist=00000000 (XEN) paging assistance: hap refcounts translate external ^^^ The presence of `hap' here indicates that the host is not vulnerable to this domain. For an HVM domain the presence of `shadow' indicates that the domain can exploit the vulnerability. MITIGATION ========== Running only PV guests will avoid this vulnerability, unless PV superpage support is enabled (see above). Running HVM guests with Hardware Assisted Paging (HAP) enabled will also avoid this vulnerability. This is the default mode on hardware supporting HAP, but can be overridden by hypervisor command line option and guest configuration setting. Such overrides ("hap=0" in either case, with variants like "no-hap" being possible in the hypervisor command line case) would need to be removed to avoid this vulnerability. CREDITS ======= This issue was discovered by Ling Liu and Yihan Lian of the Cloud Security Team, Qihoo 360. RESOLUTION ========== Applying the appropriate attached patch resolves this issue. xsa173-unstable.patch xen-unstable xsa173-4.6.patch Xen 4.6.x xsa173-4.5.patch Xen 4.5.x xsa173-4.4.patch Xen 4.4.x xsa173-4.3.patch Xen 4.3.x $ sha256sum xsa173* bd4619334351afc9f71bb529e8ac102c63415bb4d13197e3bd24a58de03726cb xsa173-unstable.patch 089c07f0c8237da674796f155ee7e3c0305efd11a59df30ef2c3d5f6b423bfea xsa173-4.3.patch 35e02b8d4c2841ad951dd967b4f11aa7911fe5d52be2cb605b174e8c2e9214ca xsa173-4.4.patch 8cd255416975b5589b85911142b385cc1ed78b8ea5e16ebe9d6c60e2679b23aa xsa173-4.5.patch 6dbc34e3e2d4415967c4406e0f8392a9395bff74da115ae20f26bd112b19017c xsa173-4.6.patch $ DEPLOYMENT DURING EMBARGO ========================= Deployment of the patches and/or mitigations described above (or others which are substantially similar) is permitted during the embargo, even on public-facing systems with untrusted guest users and administrators. But: Distribution of updated software is prohibited (except to other members of the predisclosure list). Predisclosure list members who wish to deploy significantly different patches and/or mitigations, please contact the Xen Project Security Team. (Note: this during-embargo deployment notice is retained in post-embargo publicly released Xen Project advisories, even though it is then no longer applicable. This is to enable the community to have oversight of the Xen Project Security Team's decisionmaking.) For more information about permissible uses of embargoed information, consult the Xen Project community's agreed Security Policy: http://www.xenproject.org/security-policy.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXFOGhAAoJEIP+FMlX6CvZXUYH/A1ekMpU71/JUK1c53qHmaTY ZCsJj5hArL9poTYss/AfyumZRATalPrbX/Wt6JaVMutMefgPjphP8OKTzywr/aDJ vRIim4piOABS15cWtYlfTans6X4yyk1NxmMt182osRW1JSW+OrjXORs6719zoEL7 3hzuf7g6pYiaVqtUmLEx9/U3T246ZaQ98V93YVxGGUyUYRBmFJxEAtA2yf4SlqNX G3XNDc4DZpXnp8yABFEu+atfWef/Mn/gbNdJPxUXpu25WAOGEf0/0mnEF1b+KmCZ nBXM3UwMIwN+OR0xMC447iQxvKQe7WD/6/JNMI6Bl76SSctCaLV0LU6PtyVCfJI= =FOR7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Attachment:
xsa173-unstable.patch Attachment:
xsa173-4.3.patch Attachment:
xsa173-4.4.patch Attachment:
xsa173-4.5.patch Attachment:
xsa173-4.6.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |