[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] ucode=-1: did anybody have success?
Am 06.05.2014 21:39, schrieb Atom2: > Am 06.05.14 15:27, schrieb Sven Köhler: >> Or maybe the file is taken from /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/ and is copied >> to the initrd when it is updates? > The truth is that you can't use the microcode.dat file directly - this > is a text file whereas the CPU expects a binary file. It's a pity the hypervisor doesn't understand the microcode.dat format. > You should be able > to do 'cat /lib/firmware/intel_ucode/* > /boot/microcode.blob' > and that should do it - although I have used another approach that > results in a much smaller blob file: My file is now onyl 10,240 bytes as > opposed to 576,512 bytes compared to cat /lib/firmware/... as described > above) as it only contains the required binary files for my specific CPU: The "cat /lib/firmware/intel_ucode/* > /boot/microcode.blob"-approach seems dangerous to me. Are you sure, that simply concatenating the files leaves you with a valid database? I think it's safer to use the iucode-tool. The following command simply converts microcode.dat to the binary format, right? ./iucode_tool -w /boot/microcode.blob /lib/firmware/microcode.dat Can you confirm that /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/06-25-02 (for example) is the file that contains all microcode for a CPU of family 6, model 37=0x25, and stepping 2 (which according to /proc/cpuinfo is the CPU I have in my laptop, for example). These files already exist and are very small. > I have used a tool called 'iucode-tool' to convert the Intel > distribution files to the blob binary file (I decided to name it > microcode.bin and that's what I use in the module line above). This tool > has a number of options that allow to include only those parts of the > microcode patches that are required for your specific CPU model (it is > able to scan for your CPU or you can provide the model as a command line > argument) To include only the microcode for my CPU, I have to use the -S option of iucode-tool, right? > Your best bet is to check whether your distribution offers iucode-tool > and install it. Failing this you can also download the source and > compile it (I had to do this for gentoo) - that was pretty easy. I'm using Gentoo too. I will request an ebuild for iucode-tool. Maybe I can also convince the microcode-data maintainer to install a binary BLOB in addition to microcode.dat (depending on some use-flag). > Hope this helps, You helped a lot! Thanks, Sven _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |