[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Additional Network Interface Question


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Jan Hejl <jh@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 10:39:18 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 09:41:53 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=excello.cz; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=CFbNyw9t/nSlKo7XhOydGm0rMgCd7 FflvIBkxajGbeF3g41vMTKI73HCPY1yJ+KUdxZXH3WyrQu4xotFa4GjSL2dt4eJn CCLPizJl7ux5cq1vwTbWu5yR/NRnjXMcIQo
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xen.org>

Could you please post your config file(s)?

On 17.1.2013 21:33, Wardzinski, Todd wrote:

All,

 

I have a virtual machine with eight VIF virtual devices attached to it.  Bringing up the HVM works without issue, however, *-emu devices are not assigning themselves correctly to the bridges.

 

[root@xen-tester xen]# brctl show

bridge name      bridge id                              STP enabled       interfaces

xenbr0                  8000.feffffffffff                no                           vif35.0

                                                                                                                vif35.0-emu

                                                                                                                vif35.3-emu

                                                                                                                vif35.4-emu

                                                                                                                vif35.5-emu

                                                                                                                vif35.6-emu

                                                                                                                vif35.7-emu

xenbr1                  8000.feffffffffff                no                           vif35.1

                                                                                                                vif35.1-emu

xenbr2                  8000.feffffffffff                no                           vif35.2

                                                                                                                vif35.2-emu

xenbr3                  8000.feffffffffff                no                           vif35.3

xenbr4                  8000.feffffffffff                no                           vif35.4

xenbr5                  8000.feffffffffff                no                           vif35.5

xenbr6                  8000.feffffffffff                no                           vif35.6

xenbr7                  8000.feffffffffff                no                           vif35.7

 

All the –emu devices should follow their parent devices to the assigned bridge…at least I’d assume that so.  However, as you can see, 5 of them do not.

 

Any ideas as to why this is occurring?

 

------

Wm. Todd Wardzinski

Progeny Systems

Software Engineer

 

From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wardzinski, Todd
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 3:19 PM
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] Network Interface Question

 

All,

 

When assigning both VIF networking devices and PCI passthrough based network devices, which are created first, the VIF or the PCI in the DomU?

 

------

Wm. Todd Wardzinski

Progeny Systems

Software Engineer

 



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.