Re: [Xen-users] Disk IO tuning

["Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat IT&Internet)" <nd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



Florian Heigl <florian.heigl@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb:

>> I think my bottle neck is on the host side... any suggestions?
>
>look for any qemu processes consuming 100% in top output on the host

just to make shure here:
qemu? Does this means you did not use paravirtualized linux guests but full 
virtualization instead? Full virtualized guests are by principe slower then PV 
guests.


cheers,


Niels.

- --
Niels Dettenbach
Syndicat IT&Internet
http://www.syndicat.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8

iIEEAREIAEEFAk7qFFc6HE5pZWxzIERldHRlbmJhY2ggKFN5bmRpY2F0IElUJklu
dGVybmV0KSA8bmRAc3luZGljYXQuY29tPgAKCRBU3ERlZRyiDY/YAJ9zTA1tZl8f
QFPYiMmdV2EQTJmrEACfSSHewSCWaYD0IdmXiO0inYS7Obo=
=L9fI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users