Re: [Xen-users] Re: debian wheezy interface bonding (dom0) / xen 4.1.2*

[Peter Viskup <skupko.sk@xxxxxxxxx>]

Good news for you Mark!
It is working and we are using that on our Debian Lenny/Squeeze servers:

auto xenin
iface xenin inet static
        bridge_ports bond1
        bridge_stp no
        address 192.168.0.254
        netmask 255.255.255.0

skupko@server1:~$ ip link show xenin
12: xenin: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue 
state UNKNOWN
    link/ether 00:1b:21:57:72:96 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
skupko@server1:~$ ip addr show xenin
12: xenin: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue 
state UNKNOWN
    link/ether 00:1b:21:57:72:96 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.0.254/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global xenin
    inet6 fe80::21b:21ff:fe57:7296/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

Best regards,
--
Peter Viskup

On 08/28/2011 07:56 PM, Mark Schneider wrote:
> The question is if e.g. setting with "bridge_ports bond1" should work 
> for xen (like below)?
> # ---
> auto bond1
> iface bond1 inet static
>     slaves eth1 eth3
>     bond-mode active-backup
>     #bond-mode 802.3ad
>     bond-miimon 100
>     bond-downdelay 200
>     bond-updelay 200
>
> auto xenbr1
> iface xenbr1 inet static
>     address 10.0.1.150
>     network 10.0.1.0
>     broadcast 10.0.1.255
>     netmask 255.255.255.0
>     gateway 10.0.1.1
>     #bridge_ports eth1 eth3
>     bridge_ports bond1
> # ---
>
> Thank you / regards, Mark

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users