[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Slow windows network with gplpv driver.
Dustin This is 4 of 8 real cores. I started with 2. Like to start testing a bit underpowered to see how things work. Is there an issue with multiple cores or changing the number of cores? John On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 02:58:37 pm Dustin Henning wrote: > John, > I am running an 0.9.x version of GPLPV, so forgive me if I am not up > to date on this, but in that version, having more than 1 core significantly > slowed down WindowsXP. If this is still the case, and if it transfers to > Server 2003, then you might find better performance with 1 core, and if it > shouldn't still be true, then you might have found a new problem with the > GPLPV driver. Another possibility is that the additional virtual cores are > being pinned to hyperthreads instead of real cores or something. I am > making these suggestions under the assumption that you know making 4 > virtual cores on 2 real cores host would degrade performance for obvious > reasons. Dustin > > -----Original Message----- > From: John McMonagle [mailto:johnm@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 15:51 > To: Dustin.Henning@xxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Slow windows network with gplpv driver. > > Guess I'm mostly used to linux. > iperf is a very simple tests and doesn't take good of hardware to get close > to > 1gbits/sec with gbit ethernet. > > This machine will primarily do terminal services. it will access some files > on > Linux server. > We are a linux shop and that allows us to run some widows apps while > keeping > > all the users on linux terminals. > > Did a test of the current server 2003 real server and it's getting 230 > Mbits > > /second. > Odds are the 160Mbits/second with SEP running will be Ok but I'd like to do > better. > Watching Resource monitor in server 2008 cpu goes to 100% while running > tests. > Dom0 stays at 0%. > > Ran into another strange thing. > I tried changing vcpus from from 2 to 4. > my networks speed dropped to 74 Mbits/s > > If I revert back to 2 it comes back to 160. > What can cause that? > I have not activate yet in case that matters. > > John > > On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 10:37:25 am Dustin Henning wrote: > > 1) SEP adds a network layer, it is going to slow you down, this is going > > to > > > be amplified HVM processor virtualization. > > 2) You're calling 318 Mbit/sec "usable" on Windows? Really? That's > > impressive on Windows unless you have a 10 Gbit NIC. > > The only suggestion I would have for your scenario is don't virtualize. > > I'm sure that's not what you want to hear, but I think you're asking too > > much. Dustin > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John > > McMonagle Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:30 > > To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Slow windows network with gplpv driver. > > > > On Friday, March 04, 2011 02:32:25 pm John McMonagle wrote: > > > On Thursday 03 March 2011 09:13:39 pm John McMonagle wrote: > > > > On Thursday, March 03, 2011 05:57:21 pm you wrote: > > > > > > Just did a test with 32 bit xp with 0.11.0.238 drive. > > > > > > it show device as Xen Net device driver. > > > > > > > > > > > > Iperf gives 14.7 Mbits/sec > > > > > > > > > > > > Running an xp live boot cd get 13.6 Mbits/sec > > > > > > Doesn't looks like the the pv driver is doing anything to help > > > > > > the > > > > > > I tried on a AMD server and it was about the same percentage > > > improvement. The only thing that had any noticeable affect was stopping > > > the windows firewall. > > > Had no change with /PATCHTPR or disable checksum offloading and large > > > send offloading. > > > > > > The application seemed a bit more responsive I'll see what the users > > say. > > > > I'll try to install server 2008 next week and see what happens with > > that. > > > > Any one know any tricks to get single user Windows apps to behave in a > > > multi user environment? > > > > > > John > > > > I finally did an install of server 2008 on the same xen dom0. > > Before installing pv drivers get 43 Mbit/sec. > > better than double xp. > > > > With pv driver 328 Mbit/sec. > > Not spectacular but usable. > > > > Then I installed Synaptic Endpoint Protection. > > That brought me back to 162 Mbit/sec. > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > John > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-users mailing list > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |