答复: [Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5

["Chu Qiu" <chqiu@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, Thank firstly

 

so where the vif0.0?

 

Is  the output of “brctl show ” correct?

 

bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces

eth0            8000.0015c5eb96c3       no              peth0

virbr0          8000.000000000000       yes

 

 

 

 

发件人: Guido Hecken [mailto:guido.hecken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2011年1月26日 20:50
收件人: Chu Qiu; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: AW: [Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5

 

Hi,

I think the standard bridge in xen 4.x is now called "eth0".

 

Guido

 

 

---

Von: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Chu Qiu
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2011 13:40
An: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5

Hi !

 

I have install the xen4+centos5 on my server following the post of

 

the kernel version is 2.6.32.27 which is download from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git

 

But after I reboot the server ,and run the “ifconfig”, whose output likes the following

 

 

[root@localhost scripts]# ifconfig

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:C5:EB:96:C3 

          inet addr:192.168.1.72  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0

          inet6 addr: fe80::215:c5ff:feeb:96c3/64 Scope:Link

          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1

          RX packets:17897 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:17091 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0

          RX bytes:2009054 (1.9 MiB)  TX bytes:3375426 (3.2 MiB)

 

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback 

          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0

          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host

          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1

          RX packets:8898 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:8898 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0

          RX bytes:3501148 (3.3 MiB)  TX bytes:3501148 (3.3 MiB)

 

peth0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:C5:EB:96:C3 

          inet6 addr: fe80::215:c5ff:feeb:96c3/64 Scope:Link

          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1

          RX packets:17904 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:17242 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000

          RX bytes:2363666 (2.2 MiB)  TX bytes:3459069 (3.2 MiB)

          Interrupt:16 Memory:f8000000-f8012800

 

virbr0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 26:70:02:2E:12:AD 

          inet addr:192.168.122.1  Bcast:192.168.122.255  Mask:255.255.255.0

          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1

          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0

          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:2714 (2.6 KiB)

 

 

and the output of “brctl show ” is:

bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces

eth0            8000.0015c5eb96c3       no              peth0

virbr0          8000.000000000000       yes

 

and the output of “xm list” is

[root@localhost scripts]# xm list

Name                                        ID   Mem VCPUs      State   Time(s)

Domain-0                                     0   512     4     r-----   1900.3

the libvirtd’s version is 0.8.4

 

I cannot find the network bridge “xenbr0” and “vif0” , so Did anyone have met such problem?

 

Please do me a favour!

 

Thank you very much!

 

Chqiu

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users